david on Nostr: Yeah, the AND vs OR distinction makes sense, and I think it fits well into the larger ...
Yeah, the AND vs OR distinction makes sense, and I think it fits well into the larger conceptual framework I have in mind.
So maybe there are two categories of keyword search:
1. feeds
- results arranged in reverse chronological order
- search criteria combined via OR
- examples from the fiat world: Twitter, fb, other social media
2. Non-feed search results
- results arranged by “importance scores”
- search criteria combined via AND
- examples from the fiat world: Google search
The first case, you’re basically engaged in conversations with other users, so a strong recency bias makes sense. In the second case, you’re looking for info that is not necessarily recent. There is no “conversation” per se.
What do you think?
So maybe there are two categories of keyword search:
1. feeds
- results arranged in reverse chronological order
- search criteria combined via OR
- examples from the fiat world: Twitter, fb, other social media
2. Non-feed search results
- results arranged by “importance scores”
- search criteria combined via AND
- examples from the fiat world: Google search
The first case, you’re basically engaged in conversations with other users, so a strong recency bias makes sense. In the second case, you’re looking for info that is not necessarily recent. There is no “conversation” per se.
What do you think?