📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15 📝 Original message:How about just calling ...

Roy Badami [ARCHIVE] /

npub1trc…f95j

2023-06-07 15:11:42

in reply to nevent1q…jr80

📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15
📝 Original message:How about just calling them 'type S addresses'?

Not sure any other name will in reality convey much more meaning than
that.

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 06:07:28PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> "Routing address" is pretty good too. Unsure whether the synergy and
> familiarity with bank routing numbers improves the situation, or
> not...
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Roy Badami <roy at gnomon.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> "static address" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended
> >> use/direction.
> >
> > ...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP?
> >
> > More seriously, I don't think a typical user will understand anything from
> > the phrase "static address". But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter
> > than "address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated". :-)
> >
> > -roy
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
> BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
>

Author Public Key

npub1trckpcxmceskq4cykxgwxm63n8ugrjrpu5mk83c90e4upsf7d9gqf0f95j

Seen on

wss://relay.nostr.band

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 15:11:42

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "402ce168233aeb423e9557579a283735d69e1e2862aaa344614a90c3aa5960e2", "pubkey": "58f160e0dbc661605704b190e36f5199f881c861e53763c7057e6bc0c13e6950", "created_at": 1686150702, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "6b79d8c7bec3dc6952db91cc68d0510d9897c37dcf58a24d8e2f4288fe42525c", "", "root" ], [ "e", "e1eeb1802af11c068a4b19e35144c222f0d03469e0a6f6d1753b9e3a8c3a44b6", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15\n📝 Original message:How about just calling them 'type S addresses'?\n\nNot sure any other name will in reality convey much more meaning than\nthat.\n\nOn Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 06:07:28PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e \"Routing address\" is pretty good too. Unsure whether the synergy and\n\u003e familiarity with bank routing numbers improves the situation, or\n\u003e not...\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Roy Badami \u003croy at gnomon.org.uk\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e \u003e\u003e \"static address\" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended\n\u003e \u003e\u003e use/direction.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e ...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP?\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e More seriously, I don't think a typical user will understand anything from\n\u003e \u003e the phrase \"static address\". But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter\n\u003e \u003e than \"address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated\". :-)\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e -roy\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e -- \n\u003e Jeff Garzik\n\u003e Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\n\u003e BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/\n\u003e", "sig": "2ad7fce8ec2716043153847698dd1338fdc8eb58a68cd5d259601d57e28d42b3dd4ff5086f75a42eba52451bdbb901d3095ac43b81136c415c333c660fe06b13" }