Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2014-01-15 š Original message:"Routing address" is ...
š
Original date posted:2014-01-15
š Original message:"Routing address" is pretty good too. Unsure whether the synergy and
familiarity with bank routing numbers improves the situation, or
not...
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Roy Badami <roy at gnomon.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> "static address" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended
>> use/direction.
>
> ...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP?
>
> More seriously, I don't think a typical user will understand anything from
> the phrase "static address". But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter
> than "address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated". :-)
>
> -roy
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
š Original message:"Routing address" is pretty good too. Unsure whether the synergy and
familiarity with bank routing numbers improves the situation, or
not...
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Roy Badami <roy at gnomon.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> "static address" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended
>> use/direction.
>
> ...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP?
>
> More seriously, I don't think a typical user will understand anything from
> the phrase "static address". But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter
> than "address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated". :-)
>
> -roy
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/