FreeTrade on Nostr: >I am in favor of building tools that let the user control the experience so that is ...
>I am in favor of building tools that let the user control the experience so that is works for them.
Agree!
>People should absolutely get to decide who gets to respond to them as every public communication is not an invitation for public criticism and debate. (e.g. The YouTube comments section.)
Disagree!
>Users should be able to broadcast, narrowcast, and private message.
Agree!
>Tools should allow users to distribute the messaging however they prefer and that should include how and with whom they want to engage with.
Agree!
>Some of this will be solved with the ability to incorporate different relays … public open, semi-public, private, etc.
Agree!
We're mostly in agreement. We differ on one point. I'm in favor of a protocol that gives people the power of free speech. I believe that includes the right to respond to public statements. As a reader, I also want to be able to read remarks from anybody replying to the post.
Agree!
>People should absolutely get to decide who gets to respond to them as every public communication is not an invitation for public criticism and debate. (e.g. The YouTube comments section.)
Disagree!
>Users should be able to broadcast, narrowcast, and private message.
Agree!
>Tools should allow users to distribute the messaging however they prefer and that should include how and with whom they want to engage with.
Agree!
>Some of this will be solved with the ability to incorporate different relays … public open, semi-public, private, etc.
Agree!
We're mostly in agreement. We differ on one point. I'm in favor of a protocol that gives people the power of free speech. I believe that includes the right to respond to public statements. As a reader, I also want to be able to read remarks from anybody replying to the post.