Btc Drak [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19 📝 Original message: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19
📝 Original message:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Btc Drak <btcdrak at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
> wrote:
> > I am really hoping that OP_CSV gets deployed in time to avoid such a
> > hack. There's plenty of work in the mean time!
>
> Sorry to gatecrash, but it would really help matters if those
> interested in OP_CSV could review the OP_CSV BIP[1], the pull
> request[2] and also the related BIP68 PR[3].
>
> There will also be a BIP proposal for median-past-timelock shortly
> which will need review.
>
> Lastly there is growing support for the idea of a feature-pack
> softfork which includes CLTV+CSV+BIP68+median_past_timelock as a
> single softfork so your thoughts about this deployment option would
> also greatly contribute towards establishing consensus on how to move
> forward.
>
> Regards,
>
> Drak
>
> [1]
> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010198.html
> [2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564
> [3] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6312


Gentlemen,

The "median-past-locktime" pull requests are now available as well for
review. I'm posting because it has direct relevance to Lightning as it
forms part of the locktime featureset referenced above:

BIP discussion:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010348.html
Core pull request: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6566
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150819/ec53cf3a/attachment.html>;