Btc Drak [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-17 📝 Original message: On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-08-17
📝 Original message:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> I am really hoping that OP_CSV gets deployed in time to avoid such a
> hack. There's plenty of work in the mean time!
Sorry to gatecrash, but it would really help matters if those
interested in OP_CSV could review the OP_CSV BIP[1], the pull
request[2] and also the related BIP68 PR[3].
There will also be a BIP proposal for median-past-timelock shortly
which will need review.
Lastly there is growing support for the idea of a feature-pack
softfork which includes CLTV+CSV+BIP68+median_past_timelock as a
single softfork so your thoughts about this deployment option would
also greatly contribute towards establishing consensus on how to move
forward.
Regards,
Drak
[1] http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010198.html
[2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564
[3] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6312
📝 Original message:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> I am really hoping that OP_CSV gets deployed in time to avoid such a
> hack. There's plenty of work in the mean time!
Sorry to gatecrash, but it would really help matters if those
interested in OP_CSV could review the OP_CSV BIP[1], the pull
request[2] and also the related BIP68 PR[3].
There will also be a BIP proposal for median-past-timelock shortly
which will need review.
Lastly there is growing support for the idea of a feature-pack
softfork which includes CLTV+CSV+BIP68+median_past_timelock as a
single softfork so your thoughts about this deployment option would
also greatly contribute towards establishing consensus on how to move
forward.
Regards,
Drak
[1] http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010198.html
[2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564
[3] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6312