:blobcatverified2: on Nostr: npub1fjd7s…ak83p tbh, i disagree with you on almost every point. i dont know the ...
npub1fjd7sfl9yh8xgh4jwwgfhef8hylnrvwrs9rnxraru96atpch2lrstak83p (npub1fjd…k83p) tbh, i disagree with you on almost every point.
i dont know the context, (the video you were watching), but everything you posted now seems not to be true to me.
> removing unneeded parts
i wouldnt say so, cant see them fixing up their for example DOS issues.
> people got exactly what they asked for
on nearly every online medium i get a different impression, M$ goes 180 in the direction what people want.
> TPM 2.0 is a massive security advantage
how? a TPM is there to store a secret, having no backup of that secret or having it stored in the cloud is very different from making a system secure, its just about storing a secret. Of course will they get angry when M$ decide to limit hardware in a way which dont make sense to anyone.
> requiring a microsoft account makes password brute-force impossible, because it encrypts your login details
Thats very very wrong. Simply proofen due to a windows is usable offline and doesnt require to be always online. Passwords are stored encrypted on the machine since nearly ever and they didnt change that at all.
Security, in terms of an OS cant be a Hardware Feature. A Hardware Feature can improve it for sure, but thats by far not where windows lacks of security.
i dont know the context, (the video you were watching), but everything you posted now seems not to be true to me.
> removing unneeded parts
i wouldnt say so, cant see them fixing up their for example DOS issues.
> people got exactly what they asked for
on nearly every online medium i get a different impression, M$ goes 180 in the direction what people want.
> TPM 2.0 is a massive security advantage
how? a TPM is there to store a secret, having no backup of that secret or having it stored in the cloud is very different from making a system secure, its just about storing a secret. Of course will they get angry when M$ decide to limit hardware in a way which dont make sense to anyone.
> requiring a microsoft account makes password brute-force impossible, because it encrypts your login details
Thats very very wrong. Simply proofen due to a windows is usable offline and doesnt require to be always online. Passwords are stored encrypted on the machine since nearly ever and they didnt change that at all.
Security, in terms of an OS cant be a Hardware Feature. A Hardware Feature can improve it for sure, but thats by far not where windows lacks of security.