Event JSON
{
"id": "cabd996f94f27e6ce2ef03fd0f66c04723521c8ad4226b2e265f08c656170fd2",
"pubkey": "009e7ec0b167a029a78ad003553de5a3278917d58c665ab2519f3f1c5ed86404",
"created_at": 1709657317,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e9b6365884beb7c96a586c76df49e2e3c5e3dfe37f2febf394653e8814e4792d",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"4e7a7c31331294ff7ed029614cca1e58fe5eb98a9fb6b20a89def814ce6e4fb5",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"4e62f0adb406386e7a2c24fbaa13df924457243ce91b38e6507e88eef77eb472",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"content-warning",
"\"Like\" in sentences... useful if one can accept it's general / multifunctional usage of it in expression... often useful in searching for understanding or similarities..."
],
[
"proxy",
"https://linuxrocks.online/users/nafnlj/statuses/112044101946359148",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1axmrvkyyh6muj6jcd3md7j0zu0z78hlr0uh7huu5v5lgs98y0yksptdsle I agree that there is nothing inherently wrong with the word \"like\" and that it can and often is used in a way that brings a thought together. The issue I was getting at in the article is the use of like as filler -- let's say an alternative \"um\" -- where it has no real meaning and shows up where it makes no sense.",
"sig": "c17a7ac8e88e19dd07aa296d4780597f3fe3e3f14cfcc37962039c14d1a8195b70d2f6e8d213bbfb0cb58b9df2ef44aa10df0f14a8081303a6334a5e42f963ea"
}
