Event JSON
{
"id": "b4e9406a4b657a1903499f410262efdddfaecee4037eba513f27cf341fb8f89d",
"pubkey": "58ebc0624a248b6c1a1fb3ea1b1be7dac4880f28f1504a351fdf04642f061659",
"created_at": 1731085995,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"6cb73de7c82379cd41ed5cf66a84436aa24ca6f614d96a47c612e7777a397037",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"3419d0ec848085b4bc63d232de38ce9c3d7eeeef47b69c851bc2b46455a5a1c9",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"550f90b39dafe2bee50e7906aa01f01c40f4ad44127343621c8c180fd6804ccd",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://zirk.us/users/interfluidity/statuses/113448451779306764",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1djmnme7gyduu6s0dtnmx4pzrd23yefhkznvk537xztnhw73ewqmsnk5jgh no. the alternative is to point to institutions and leaders. the electorate is what it is, the crooked timber we all constitute. but it doesn’t have a voice or will independent of the institutions we develop to give it one. under different elector systems, we’d have drastically different outcomes. we’d have a drastically different electorate, because institutions shape the public much more than public opinion can reshape institutions.",
"sig": "19963a9f879354b60a0c43eab0ca0f4b666c20957b0c492bcc537cfabc926d302efa3f90c15d873d95a8810196ff080ca15798b20452f7e0ef77df2752a5046e"
}