SLCW on Nostr: A judge is not a scientist, and science isn't negated by the opinion of a single ...
A judge is not a scientist, and science isn't negated by the opinion of a single layperson. The cure for bad science is good science, and the scientific process conducted by relevant subject-matter experts. A judge has no role in that process, and his opinion is just that. An opinion. Judges are flawed laypersons who are subject to emotion and preexisting beliefs. And that really goes for any one man. That's why scientific knowledge is the product of an established process, including publication and peer review. The opinion of a judge is completely irrelevant with regards to the consensus and conclusions of the scientific body. And the opinion of a judge most certainly does not negate the compendium of knowledge and research on which the consensus regarding fluoride, or any other scientific matter rests.
Published at
2024-09-26 05:43:16Event JSON
{
"id": "3077c3477fb68cc7a0f73c40799b7ba414ff26ff2c6092a504211f239eee4c9d",
"pubkey": "65912a7ad17fd5cf3bacce9759f3bea3a44f9a3397340e559cf067945dc638bf",
"created_at": 1727329396,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7aa6cbd0d9a0329aff635c872876a29110449636bd74954f692eef319382a70a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"86e6a91579da5865b471b6911a4e23b0d72a10db4e885755c1bff755b495fb9f"
],
[
"e",
"3ab0ab961ab7204cbca95d1a5c013175856b2075b5d79727614d6ff817446d6b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"65912a7ad17fd5cf3bacce9759f3bea3a44f9a3397340e559cf067945dc638bf"
],
[
"p",
"83d302b5c25ed43e5b75532fa6a6bda21c4b63e9f516826798f516fc4159b9c7"
]
],
"content": "A judge is not a scientist, and science isn't negated by the opinion of a single layperson. The cure for bad science is good science, and the scientific process conducted by relevant subject-matter experts. A judge has no role in that process, and his opinion is just that. An opinion. Judges are flawed laypersons who are subject to emotion and preexisting beliefs. And that really goes for any one man. That's why scientific knowledge is the product of an established process, including publication and peer review. The opinion of a judge is completely irrelevant with regards to the consensus and conclusions of the scientific body. And the opinion of a judge most certainly does not negate the compendium of knowledge and research on which the consensus regarding fluoride, or any other scientific matter rests. ",
"sig": "ee103cfda15750c576992dc0dd008d5d26045073bdaa5da07c522b726f53d37fe6ef9c5f115fb7640260a1df9ff65633099be2bcec4da4c0d05753e14ac53773"
}
