LogicallyMinded on Nostr: Many scientific studies have been discussed and reviewed during the lawsuit to make ...

Many scientific studies have been discussed and reviewed during the lawsuit to make the case for or against the harm of water #fluoridation. A judge is supposed to be able to understand and interpret those as well as the testimonies of experts. If not, then the judge wouldn’t be competent on the matter. No scientific study constitutes objective evidence by itself because a study can be partial, bias or even fraudulent. You always need a mind to interpret the evidences presented by both parties. The role of a judge is to be as impartial as possible. Also, it’s not particularly the objectivity of the decision I was pointing to but rather the fact that fluoridation of water is now official recognized as harmful (scientific literature was pointing to these conclusions a long time ago).

#Health