SLCW on Nostr: Ok, but a judge isn't a scientist, and a judge's legal opinion isn't tantamount to ...
Ok, but a judge isn't a scientist, and a judge's legal opinion isn't tantamount to established fact. I'm not weighing in on the details of this issue, but it's dishonest to point to a judge's ruling as some sort objective evidence relating to the empirical truth of the underlying question.
Published at
2024-09-26 05:19:27Event JSON
{
"id": "86e6a91579da5865b471b6911a4e23b0d72a10db4e885755c1bff755b495fb9f",
"pubkey": "65912a7ad17fd5cf3bacce9759f3bea3a44f9a3397340e559cf067945dc638bf",
"created_at": 1727327967,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7aa6cbd0d9a0329aff635c872876a29110449636bd74954f692eef319382a70a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"83d302b5c25ed43e5b75532fa6a6bda21c4b63e9f516826798f516fc4159b9c7"
]
],
"content": "Ok, but a judge isn't a scientist, and a judge's legal opinion isn't tantamount to established fact. I'm not weighing in on the details of this issue, but it's dishonest to point to a judge's ruling as some sort objective evidence relating to the empirical truth of the underlying question. ",
"sig": "02eb0a5f74bbab9ff3484ae52b71d5c4b2c9690cce7d32bd086cfaee901481444df524a97bd7e46475c4a968e5617377bd57a4650916989266c408c58d8fd594"
}
