yael on Nostr: If you read any of the language of the model bills, they are written in a negative ...
If you read any of the language of the model bills, they are written in a negative rights position (similar to the bill of rights): the government SHALL NOT do X or Y with relation to Bitcoin or any crypto-offspring (including XMR). There are no positive rights included.
The aim is to restrict the ability of the state to intervene in peer-to-peer transfers and proof of work mining, and in doing so, recognize natural rights to use P2P. Do you oppose that?
Published at
2024-12-30 08:15:37Event JSON
{
"id": "098c70ce0268f54b9b8e310f789f03331093e5062799214f5cf36b91edd6766a",
"pubkey": "a367f9eb1cb3a241a7f3646f31cd6d597bbbbf8eaeb5cd2e707d09b00633efea",
"created_at": 1735546537,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"a",
"30023:a367f9eb1cb3a241a7f3646f31cd6d597bbbbf8eaeb5cd2e707d09b00633efea:Bitcoin-Model-Policies-zt40oq",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"048fc0890eb17edc16d6280fa92e7de76592fe0bf1d450327addc943fbdc8078",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"76076b9e2eca3c4f25435780f57b1d5649c7d08b784c20f96c384fa0fec5456f"
]
],
"content": "If you read any of the language of the model bills, they are written in a negative rights position (similar to the bill of rights): the government SHALL NOT do X or Y with relation to Bitcoin or any crypto-offspring (including XMR). There are no positive rights included.\n\nThe aim is to restrict the ability of the state to intervene in peer-to-peer transfers and proof of work mining, and in doing so, recognize natural rights to use P2P. Do you oppose that?",
"sig": "c9a4411307eeb361e2e7ed33c7c43946933222a98e9ea0b3c30c469a088183ab0968555018f5be2b9c188ac7f87d81839ca5046e15e1f48b0e6da35de785a11f"
}
