📅 Original date posted:2015-07-18 📝 Original message: There doesn't seem to be ...

Nick ODell [ARCHIVE] /

npub192d…wur0

2023-06-09 12:43:40

in reply to nevent1q…vseh

📅 Original date posted:2015-07-18
📝 Original message:
There doesn't seem to be any deployment timeline, and the BIP is
incredibly out of date.

I agree that rules 2-7 are nonstandard, but I don't think they're
applied to blocks.

>(details of that are forthcoming soon now that it has been deployed).
I was under the impression that the changes in BIP66 were only
prioritized because asking OpenSSL to verify DER encoding required
building with a specific version of OpenSSL, not because of any
security vulns.

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Mark Friedenbach <mark at friedenbach.org> wrote:
> BIP62 is not in any way abandoned. It just takes time to implement such
> broad changes and to be assured of their safety. BIP66 rushed a subset of
> features that were necessary to close we pretty serious vulnerabilities
> (details of that are forthcoming soon now that it has been deployed).
>
> On Jul 18, 2015 08:15, "Nick ODell" <nickodell at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm pretty sure that BIP62 is abandonded. At least, the PR based on it
>> was never merged. BIP66 implements some of it, and rules 2-7 have been
>> nonstandard for a while, but I don't think that rules 2-7 are enforced
>> against new blocks.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/ln-deploy-draft-01.pdf
>> >
>> > I haven't had time to proofread this properly, nor check the
>> > script examples. But wanted to post it before the weekend so you all
>> > have something to chew on :)
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Rusty.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Lightning-dev mailing list
>> > Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lightning-dev mailing list
>> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev

Author Public Key

npub192dh6dprqsvsrdeche436s9xunwnlyzpu7jl5j3d83nz62tgznrsnqwur0

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-09 12:43:40

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "17719cad4525401842a8ff7e5af8f51c5f61ce46e987dabd509871c8912870e6", "pubkey": "2a9b7d3423041901b738be6b1d40a6e4dd3f9041e7a5fa4a2d3c662d296814c7", "created_at": 1686314620, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "a859dce2c9cc841a5be8294d50ac395dcd85f4a25bee712ee1cc23781bfb221c", "", "root" ], [ "e", "24805d7741908ff081b8ed3c9ccaeda737436c30a5d5c944c68f0bd891258b57", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "1c61d995949cbfaf14f767784e166bde865c7b8783d7aa3bf0a1d014b70c0069" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-18\n📝 Original message:\nThere doesn't seem to be any deployment timeline, and the BIP is\nincredibly out of date.\n\nI agree that rules 2-7 are nonstandard, but I don't think they're\napplied to blocks.\n\n\u003e(details of that are forthcoming soon now that it has been deployed).\nI was under the impression that the changes in BIP66 were only\nprioritized because asking OpenSSL to verify DER encoding required\nbuilding with a specific version of OpenSSL, not because of any\nsecurity vulns.\n\nOn Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Mark Friedenbach \u003cmark at friedenbach.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e BIP62 is not in any way abandoned. It just takes time to implement such\n\u003e broad changes and to be assured of their safety. BIP66 rushed a subset of\n\u003e features that were necessary to close we pretty serious vulnerabilities\n\u003e (details of that are forthcoming soon now that it has been deployed).\n\u003e\n\u003e On Jul 18, 2015 08:15, \"Nick ODell\" \u003cnickodell at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e I'm pretty sure that BIP62 is abandonded. At least, the PR based on it\n\u003e\u003e was never merged. BIP66 implements some of it, and rules 2-7 have been\n\u003e\u003e nonstandard for a while, but I don't think that rules 2-7 are enforced\n\u003e\u003e against new blocks.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Rusty Russell \u003crusty at rustcorp.com.au\u003e\n\u003e\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e \u003e Hi all,\n\u003e\u003e \u003e\n\u003e\u003e \u003e http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/ln-deploy-draft-01.pdf\n\u003e\u003e \u003e\n\u003e\u003e \u003e I haven't had time to proofread this properly, nor check the\n\u003e\u003e \u003e script examples. But wanted to post it before the weekend so you all\n\u003e\u003e \u003e have something to chew on :)\n\u003e\u003e \u003e\n\u003e\u003e \u003e Cheers,\n\u003e\u003e \u003e Rusty.\n\u003e\u003e \u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e \u003e Lightning-dev mailing list\n\u003e\u003e \u003e Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e\u003e \u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev\n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e Lightning-dev mailing list\n\u003e\u003e Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev", "sig": "d816e46efee18225e9372e9b657897e53adbee5616d32f7fd7749b3cdb343d58744d05a75bfba1cd84a67703359bb3536121b5840e70efa3c89f0abbd4432a46" }