Mark Friedenbach [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-18 📝 Original message: BIP62 is not in any way ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-07-18
📝 Original message:
BIP62 is not in any way abandoned. It just takes time to implement such
broad changes and to be assured of their safety. BIP66 rushed a subset of
features that were necessary to close we pretty serious vulnerabilities
(details of that are forthcoming soon now that it has been deployed).
On Jul 18, 2015 08:15, "Nick ODell" <nickodell at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm pretty sure that BIP62 is abandonded. At least, the PR based on it
> was never merged. BIP66 implements some of it, and rules 2-7 have been
> nonstandard for a while, but I don't think that rules 2-7 are enforced
> against new blocks.
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/ln-deploy-draft-01.pdf
> >
> > I haven't had time to proofread this properly, nor check the
> > script examples. But wanted to post it before the weekend so you all
> > have something to chew on :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rusty.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lightning-dev mailing list
> > Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150718/d047d7b3/attachment.html>;