Dr. "Doctor Sex" Sex on Nostr: My man I do not think you get how this works. >they get the first amendment Up to the ...
My man I do not think you get how this works.
>they get the first amendment
Up to the point of defamation/slander/libel
>talking about a public figure
Still applies
>push advertisers into a boycott
That depends entirely on how they do it. If it's just a vague, general, "hey we don't like what this guy is doing, boycott him!" To noone in particular, sure. If they're specifically reaching out to and applying pressure in a more direct and immediate manner, then no, that is not covered.
>prove they're lying and they know
This requires them to prove that he is an antisemite to begin with.
>they're also probably not lying
On what grounds? Maybe if you agree with the ADL to a tee what "antisemitism" is, but frankly, I do not have any confidence whatsoever that their definition could hold up in court.
>they get the first amendment
Up to the point of defamation/slander/libel
>talking about a public figure
Still applies
>push advertisers into a boycott
That depends entirely on how they do it. If it's just a vague, general, "hey we don't like what this guy is doing, boycott him!" To noone in particular, sure. If they're specifically reaching out to and applying pressure in a more direct and immediate manner, then no, that is not covered.
>prove they're lying and they know
This requires them to prove that he is an antisemite to begin with.
>they're also probably not lying
On what grounds? Maybe if you agree with the ADL to a tee what "antisemitism" is, but frankly, I do not have any confidence whatsoever that their definition could hold up in court.