tranny demon hacker on Nostr: alternatively Hofstadter could have rephrased rule 1 like so: Rule I: Suppose you ...
alternatively Hofstadter could have rephrased rule 1 like so:
Rule I: Suppose you have "xI". Then you may add "xIU" to your collection.
this makes the rules more uniform
but while Haskell easily permits pattern matching on the head and tail of the list, no such luck for last
Published at
2024-11-01 20:14:47Event JSON
{
"id": "105792d5cdcf69a8b7f06940f75ef33a8a6d6c6a8c3b16811c80d3880ebaa879",
"pubkey": "6e5b64a93f9c17d6528911485e399c8be0361c502e3c736e8118f8e00d950d0c",
"created_at": 1730492087,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"db5cc0f78736013015ad32511ec67b21ebb4fbdd1d7d173663d0877f4f3a3aa1",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://kolektiva.social/users/beka_valentine/statuses/113409529417045977",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "alternatively Hofstadter could have rephrased rule 1 like so:\n\nRule I: Suppose you have \"xI\". Then you may add \"xIU\" to your collection.\n\nthis makes the rules more uniform\n\nbut while Haskell easily permits pattern matching on the head and tail of the list, no such luck for last",
"sig": "9dfc61f449d99fd811391db7ce327478e6fe2ac70992435bcc1495d8b97e820dada4fdbeca00f2d2de3232b996e0d9a18388b4d61139b761196bb1a22a991d95"
}
