brockm on Nostr: You are conceding an easement on Peter's property rights, though, which is violative ...

You are conceding an easement on Peter's property rights, though, which is violative of Rothbard's natural law principles. Which is fine. I believe such easements must exist, as well. But I'd argue this is a fatal blow to anarcho-capitalist political theory, more generally if you think through the implications of granting this easement based on circumstances. It means the NAP and self-ownership model is not completely self-consistent, and special accordance's need to be made at the limit. So you've really conceded my point.