Mika on Nostr: if users being able to override an instance block/mute for their account alone will ...
if users being able to override an instance block/mute for their account alone will disrupt these enforcements/moderation for everyone else on the instance (so not really for their accounts alone), which I guess is possible, then it's certainly not what I would want.
The "best" scenario I'm looking for is that for instance maintainers to still enforce blocks/mutes for all of their members, but with the only difference being users could perhaps granularly add exceptions to what is blocked/muted **for them** (not others). So for example if their instance blocks/mutes federation with Threads/Meta, but they alone would want to still federate with Threads/Meta.
As of right now, users could only **add** to the block/mute list **for themselves**, not override or add exceptions to what's enforced by their instance.
The "best" scenario I'm looking for is that for instance maintainers to still enforce blocks/mutes for all of their members, but with the only difference being users could perhaps granularly add exceptions to what is blocked/muted **for them** (not others). So for example if their instance blocks/mutes federation with Threads/Meta, but they alone would want to still federate with Threads/Meta.
As of right now, users could only **add** to the block/mute list **for themselves**, not override or add exceptions to what's enforced by their instance.