npub1trdnq…gussx npub1cscw5…t8pjk npub1kjauf…ke5gq I agree that it makes sense ...

npub1klu…p8jw

2023-07-28 18:06:57

in reply to nevent1q…zae2

npub1trdnqrfstufc45awha43p6xy2n0v6czuhapzh4r09hap08dg0c6s9gussx (npub1trd…ussx) npub1cscw5kknl3mwpqs8g8udnnwklzwpa2klfzl4wpumuwyjypppg5aset8pjk (npub1csc…8pjk) npub1kjauf5ae53pstgv9u7mkfw2lzluyvtqhev6tj5fx85kfthck7r8qgke5gq (npub1kja…e5gq) I agree that it makes sense to target some regulations specifically towards big tech. DMA has rules specifically for “gatekeepers”, which are the biggest. The proposed ADPPA in the us has so many tiers I’ve lost track — including an exemption from some requirements specifically for Cambridge Analytica-sized companies. But of course Cambridge Anslytica highlights the challenges with this approach, big tech companies will look for clever ways around any regulation. As you say, the devil’s in the details. More positively though one of the few topics that has bipartisan agreement in the US is the need to do something about big tech, and the EU agrees … we’ll see if it translates to anything effective

Author Public Key

npub1kluxxu0eukhalwtwm4gcnuqcw980mdg8nznvw8qaqk34vy0tzdtqh7p8jw

Show more details

Published at

2023-07-28 18:06:57

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "934afd483f2f70fea9ebe24a153dbcb0ce33f90f0ac107b3a76ca84951eb4cc0", "pubkey": "b7f86371f9e5afdfb96edd5189f018714efdb50798a6c71c1d05a35611eb1356", "created_at": 1690567617, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "p", "58db300d305f138ad3aebf6b10e8c454decd605cbf422bd46f2dfa179da87e35", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "c430ea5ad3fc76e0820741f8d9cdd6f89c1eaadf48bf57079be389220421453b", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "b4bbc4d3b9a44305a185e7b764b95f17f8462c17cb34b951263d2c95df16f0ce", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "0b9db3c0a234209dc7a0645154b009b96c8f8fdadd0558d704dcb85404b2bb9c", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "c5e911ba68147d9efc284a4a7069358904dff0d4a5e93d6df545dd97d64e1fd3", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "45ad952de844e5bf4fa3a5b6c47a13c2b9159764dd58fe123ce7171890e73da2", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "e", "504e9edd9f7155033f4411322eb715386b363f4b2e9236a12c83c696182dc228", "wss://relay.mostr.pub", "reply" ], [ "mostr", "https://blahaj.zone/notes/9hqgmf629a" ] ], "content": "nostr:npub1trdnqrfstufc45awha43p6xy2n0v6czuhapzh4r09hap08dg0c6s9gussx nostr:npub1cscw5kknl3mwpqs8g8udnnwklzwpa2klfzl4wpumuwyjypppg5aset8pjk nostr:npub1kjauf5ae53pstgv9u7mkfw2lzluyvtqhev6tj5fx85kfthck7r8qgke5gq I agree that it makes sense to target some regulations specifically towards big tech. DMA has rules specifically for “gatekeepers”, which are the biggest. The proposed ADPPA in the us has so many tiers I’ve lost track — including an exemption from some requirements specifically for Cambridge Analytica-sized companies. But of course Cambridge Anslytica highlights the challenges with this approach, big tech companies will look for clever ways around any regulation. As you say, the devil’s in the details. More positively though one of the few topics that has bipartisan agreement in the US is the need to do something about big tech, and the EU agrees … we’ll see if it translates to anything effective", "sig": "6d167321846885fc59e3798c14778eac7706d92d8b652ea044af17d9d8e2854a23512a54d4e3a7dc3057ad432926903b136f93766f81a80198259c47f2ea8033" }