Beef on Nostr: npub18ecfw…mc8r8 npub1xn0tm…fugrf npub1wvjae…3nyah Your question regards crime, ...
npub18ecfwyt5syd272ljzfgn5k5y5dscvld5zxd2938gcjnacq27jtqq4mc8r8 (npub18ec…c8r8) npub1xn0tmjn8gaspzj9m83nykqssq62v3dg7u6sf2z2gvyqapv49f6pqxfugrf (npub1xn0…ugrf) npub1wvjael3hmja0smtadusjuj6fqz0q2z0re5qph8929x2n5f0mn3yqy3nyah (npub1wvj…nyah)
Your question regards crime, defined in this context as a violation of the nonaggression principle. You have three ways of dealing with it: security, defense, and restitution.
We have very large public and private security sectors already. Anarchism simply says it should all be private. Instead of taxes, some "public" security could be funded by "crime insurance" premiums. Crime insurance would pay policyholders in the event a crime was committed in the area.
Your question regards crime, defined in this context as a violation of the nonaggression principle. You have three ways of dealing with it: security, defense, and restitution.
We have very large public and private security sectors already. Anarchism simply says it should all be private. Instead of taxes, some "public" security could be funded by "crime insurance" premiums. Crime insurance would pay policyholders in the event a crime was committed in the area.