Event JSON
{
"id": "560d59c9700d502ae17ef4e7391ef3fd2ed7abecea4a22f0b87b8926e6176c62",
"pubkey": "6d375d5dca4cddbb23347d5058115ca3f6ca73dd977efa9b87e1536c56d12a54",
"created_at": 1690568863,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e7f76f0d1fdf887c12cbf5eaf15dd3bb0b88f806051739f63200aae91a8a734e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"28605d0e602ee0cdc2159134deabd7caf231ee7dbd58e013107b3e8400950ce2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/users/coreyrayburnyung/statuses/110793121029338262"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1ulmk7rglm7y8cykt7h40zhwnhv9c37qxq5tnna3jqz4wjx52wd8q2whweg Unless it is a fundamental claim to the prior article or a salient issue in current debates, I think a footnote is best. If it doesn't meet those conditions, I think it depends on how neatly and coherently it may be integrated into the main text of your new article.",
"sig": "d775c3aac440470e37bec1ebc99d143b650c4080e98a7cda3abc050f40a61e7d2dc3d789a39bea5b6f1cf43af9b597d74f80f6adfa0c033288e9c42281506b93"
}