Glenn Fleishman on Nostr: A follow-up! I found a reference online that suggested Popular Science had failed to ...
A follow-up! I found a reference online that suggested Popular Science had failed to file the then-required copyright renewal for its magazines. The U of Penn has digitized all the renewal books, the official source. For 1940, there would need to be a +28 renewal (could be 67, 68, or 69). No renewals for any issues any year. Suck up, PopSci, those are in the public domain.
Published at
2023-09-29 22:05:40Event JSON
{
"id": "7363fe01c008695cf80310ac4b7237470dd7963c2cd9ba9e2cf5d7981633a986",
"pubkey": "1259066ea08311bb278605654b33524b435bcd0989a685368377e8c81e3ad3ee",
"created_at": 1696025140,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"11aa643f514a7fdd1b46d7fb64889b1a7bcf6c4a364089fa88f4605b85712fdd",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://twit.social/users/glennf/statuses/111150703592611659",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "A follow-up! I found a reference online that suggested Popular Science had failed to file the then-required copyright renewal for its magazines. The U of Penn has digitized all the renewal books, the official source. For 1940, there would need to be a +28 renewal (could be 67, 68, or 69). No renewals for any issues any year. Suck up, PopSci, those are in the public domain.",
"sig": "c0764ef6b66d71377085c957db6ac5b233911a8e256aeb153037274fc44ad490d74c5e705c6c3c0390651b30c35873a2b657744b90239072e977d8a4836bfa86"
}
