Glenn Fleishman on Nostr: I wanted to use a few images from a 1940 Popular Science article on comics. (This ...
I wanted to use a few images from a 1940 Popular Science article on comics. (This remains under copyright until 2036.) The licensing people said $3,240 to use in a book. I said, this is a modest circulation book and I want to use just a fraction of the article. The response: there’s no adjustment in the rate for any reason, including whether you reprint the whole article or not.
And that is why people hate copyright terms.
Do I have a fair-use stance to make? Possibly. Will I? ????
Published at
2023-09-29 17:50:15Event JSON
{
"id": "11aa643f514a7fdd1b46d7fb64889b1a7bcf6c4a364089fa88f4605b85712fdd",
"pubkey": "1259066ea08311bb278605654b33524b435bcd0989a685368377e8c81e3ad3ee",
"created_at": 1696009815,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://twit.social/users/glennf/statuses/111149699278040300",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "I wanted to use a few images from a 1940 Popular Science article on comics. (This remains under copyright until 2036.) The licensing people said $3,240 to use in a book. I said, this is a modest circulation book and I want to use just a fraction of the article. The response: there’s no adjustment in the rate for any reason, including whether you reprint the whole article or not.\n\nAnd that is why people hate copyright terms.\n\nDo I have a fair-use stance to make? Possibly. Will I? ????",
"sig": "d46b74776bd1a08e02df98cd014464f927df8e534db93c0453adbae1bbbb47c9b2fe8bff7a1009af16d4a9e272c32608c3fd25d18859c4800893cf4c8a13f496"
}
