mx amber alex on Nostr: npub1cmgqv…wrzd2 if someone says "this reminds me of X and this alienates me ...
npub1cmgqvz7xr07euwkum3mjghjqcu4d3k2fcyf6g4uwwe5ggnd6fetq0wrzd2 (npub1cmg…rzd2) if someone says "this reminds me of X and this alienates me because I believe Y", how can you say "I disagree"? It doesn't remind you, but you can't dispute what it reminds me of, and if you don't believe Y, you can't say "I disagree" to my assurance that it does alienate me because I do believe in Y.
I didn't say "this is like Twitter and bad", I said "I feel reminded of Twitter and don't like it", you can't say "I disagree" to that, unless you developed the superpower of changing people's thoughts and feelings.
I never made any assertion about algorithms being no fun; you could disagree with that if I had said that, but I didn't. The one thing you can dispute is that Eugen has been emulating Twitter in implementing more algorithmic features, and considering you expressly defend said features, I doubt you would deny Eugen has been introducing them. What exactly are you disagreeing with?
I didn't say "this is like Twitter and bad", I said "I feel reminded of Twitter and don't like it", you can't say "I disagree" to that, unless you developed the superpower of changing people's thoughts and feelings.
I never made any assertion about algorithms being no fun; you could disagree with that if I had said that, but I didn't. The one thing you can dispute is that Eugen has been emulating Twitter in implementing more algorithmic features, and considering you expressly defend said features, I doubt you would deny Eugen has been introducing them. What exactly are you disagreeing with?