Sofia on Nostr: Silly :gl: :les heart: > I wonder how normal it is to have sexual experiences in an ...
Silly :gl: :les heart: (npub1e9t…wuqv)
> I wonder how normal it is to have sexual experiences in an age gap relationship or if it’s really not common at all.
See attachment, particularly the size of each group on the right, this is specifically about someone's first time but it should be close enough
> I wonder how much of it usually is considered traumatic to the minors involved.
"""
Table 6 shows results for the logistic regressions examining the likelihood of positive reactions in terms of various personal and situational variables (most of those considered previously), along with age class added as a predictor of special
interest. This analysis was done separately by participant sex. Each model was highly significant. Age class, after adjusting for other variables in the models, was not related to the likelihood of positive reactions in either model. For example, compared to being in the minor–adult groups, being in the corresponding adult–adult groups was associated with virtually zero change in the likelihood of positive reactions (AORs = .92 and .98, respectively, in the male and female analyses).
Age at first coitus, adjusting for other variables, was not significant for males but was for females, with older ages being modestly related to a greater likelihood of a positive reaction. Partner age difference was significant only for males, in which a greater age difference with their female partner was associated with a slight increase in the odds of reacting positively.
Affirmatively wanting the coitus was significantly related to an increased likelihood of positive reactions just for females, with medium effect size. Expecting the coitus to happen was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of positive reactions for both sexes, with a small effect size for males and small-medium one for females. Familiarity, for partners at all levels compared to being a close partner, was significant for both sexes. When partners were close, compared to being strangers, the odds of positive reactions were multiplied by a factor of almost 3 for males (AOR = 2.70—i.e., = 1.00/0.37 in Table 6) and more than 7 for females (AOR = 7.14).
"""
Both from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02631-5
> I wonder how normal it is to have sexual experiences in an age gap relationship or if it’s really not common at all.
See attachment, particularly the size of each group on the right, this is specifically about someone's first time but it should be close enough
> I wonder how much of it usually is considered traumatic to the minors involved.
"""
Table 6 shows results for the logistic regressions examining the likelihood of positive reactions in terms of various personal and situational variables (most of those considered previously), along with age class added as a predictor of special
interest. This analysis was done separately by participant sex. Each model was highly significant. Age class, after adjusting for other variables in the models, was not related to the likelihood of positive reactions in either model. For example, compared to being in the minor–adult groups, being in the corresponding adult–adult groups was associated with virtually zero change in the likelihood of positive reactions (AORs = .92 and .98, respectively, in the male and female analyses).
Age at first coitus, adjusting for other variables, was not significant for males but was for females, with older ages being modestly related to a greater likelihood of a positive reaction. Partner age difference was significant only for males, in which a greater age difference with their female partner was associated with a slight increase in the odds of reacting positively.
Affirmatively wanting the coitus was significantly related to an increased likelihood of positive reactions just for females, with medium effect size. Expecting the coitus to happen was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of positive reactions for both sexes, with a small effect size for males and small-medium one for females. Familiarity, for partners at all levels compared to being a close partner, was significant for both sexes. When partners were close, compared to being strangers, the odds of positive reactions were multiplied by a factor of almost 3 for males (AOR = 2.70—i.e., = 1.00/0.37 in Table 6) and more than 7 for females (AOR = 7.14).
"""
Both from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02631-5