0xpantera
franco

Putting the finishing touches on my Farcaster vs Nostr piece. Would appreciate a separate pair of eyes from the Nostr community to review it! It’s focused on technical differences of the protocols

2025-03-29 19:00:23 UTC

- reply

Once you receive messages, they are decrypted locally and stored in your device’s local storage. Search is done on the local decrypted copy of the chat history.

2025-03-29 09:52:08 UTC

On August 15, 2010, Bitcoin broke.
A bug in Block 74638 created 184 billion BTC out of thin air. That’s not a typo. Two outputs of 92 billion BTC each slipped through because the code didn’t check for integer overflow. The system just accepted it. Bitcoin’s sacred 21 million cap? Completely ignored.
This wasn’t a theoretical flaw. It actually happened. And it proved something most people still don’t understand.
Bitcoin’s scarcity is not protected by code. It’s protected by people.
The only reason Bitcoin didn’t die that day is because someone noticed. A fix was pushed. A patched client was released. Nodes upgraded. Within five hours, the invalid block was erased from consensus. Bitcoin’s monetary policy was rescued, not by the protocol, but by the humans running it.
That’s the truth behind the “trustless” narrative. Code did not save Bitcoin. The community did.
Scarcity was never a guarantee. It was a fight. And it still is.

2025-03-23 20:36:12 UTC

- reply

Awesome! Thanks! Will look into it. @nprofile…xw5w has probably worked on something to enable this

2025-03-23 18:58:37 UTC

- reply

What do you mean by ephemeral accounts? Just temporary? Would they differ at the protocol level from normal accounts?

2025-03-14 20:41:07 UTC

- reply

I can zap from an iPhone. Using primal.

2025-03-13 23:48:34 UTC

You can now make bitcoin lightning payments using a starknet wallet like Braavos.
Scan any Lightning terminal with a QR code, use $STRK to pay (auto converts to BTC), and you’re done.
https://x.com/myBraavos/status/1900110486651199677

2025-03-03 03:55:40 UTC

Crypto Czar, 2021
https://m.primal.net/PRre.jpg

2025-02-27 17:34:50 UTC

- reply

Yes, but I have to swipe precisely from the edge to do so. What I mean is that I should be able to swipe from the center of the screen, for example, to exit the thread. I’m sorry if this is not clear. I don’t know the precise terminology for this action. AI came up with “edge independent back gesture”.

2025-02-26 23:21:55 UTC

- reply

Would be great to have back gestures
https://primal.net/e/note10p6nj53p0jgms5ymmrc6susyan802r0wpq0tqhxxcfc78wse2jyswwv5pk

2025-02-26 07:30:18 UTC

- reply

I work on cryptography research and development:
Depends on usage:
- Chatgpt is my go to for most things. I have been using deep research a lot for research.
- Perplexity replaced google for me. I also like their UI. Might replace this with Brave’s Leo as its more privacy preserving.
- I use Claude for coding and writing (haven't tried Claude Code yet).
- I use Grok to explain tweets. Started using their Deep Search feature but haven't tested it enough. It's cool that it doesn't seem to have any limits on content (except negative things about trump and elon).
- I use Replit to create mini apps for personal use. Development is fast, no writing code, results arent great but they work and are cheap.
Ideally would want to cutback and only use 1-2 but wanted to give them all a try.

2025-02-26 04:20:38 UTC

- reply

Monthly:
- chatgpt pro ($200)
- replit agent (depends on usage)
- Claude pro ($18) + API usage
- perplexity ($20)
- Grok with X premium ($10)

2025-02-23 03:33:13 UTC

Show this to anyone who thinks ETH is the only chain to ever hard fork at the founder's behest.
https://m.primal.net/PHdB.jpg

2025-02-23 02:57:35 UTC

ELI5 why we cannot "rollback" Ethereum
After yesterday's Bybit hack, crypto commentators are again asking why Ethereum cannot "rollback" the chain to reverse the hack.
While experienced ecosystem actors near-unanimously agree that this is infeasible, it's worth breaking down why this reasonably sounding proposal is technically intractable for less knowledgeable observers. If that's you, consider this an "ELI5" version of why this is impossible.
First, some context on rollbacks:
The idea of a blockchain "rolling back" stems from an early incident in the Bitcoin blockchain. In 2010, less than two years since Bitcoin's launch, a bug in the client software caused 184 billion (yes, *billion*) Bitcoins to be minted in block 74638.
To fix this, Satoshi released a software patch to the Bitcoin client which invalidated the transactions. This had the effect of "rolling back" the chain which had kept growing in the meantime to block 74637. In less than a day, the new chain had accumulated enough proof-of-work to become canonical and all user transactions that had been rolled back were included in the new chain. Note that at the time, Bitcoin's mining difficulty was 10 billion times lower than today, and the BTCUSD price was about 0.07$.
In short, this situation was unique in that a clear protocol bug led to the problematic transactions, which could easily be identified due to their large amount. Additionally, Bitcoin's limited adoption made it easy to distribute a new client version and quickly mine a new chain segment.
Ethereum and TheDAO:
Ethereum's early history had a superficially similar crisis which often leads to confusion about the practicality of rollbacks. In 2016, a popular Ethereum application, TheDAO, had ~15% of all ETH in existence under its control. Unfortunately, a hacker found a bug in the application's code that allowed them to steal all of these funds. This was notably different than the Bitcoin situation because the Ethereum protocol worked as intended, it was the application built **on** Ethereum that had an issue.
Luckily, the developers of TheDAO had implemented a failsafe where withdrawals from the applications were frozen for a month before they were completed. This presented a unique opportunity to address the bug: the code of the application could be changed to prevent the funds from ultimately going to the hackers.
Because there was no way in the application itself to do this, Ethereum protocol developers had to make the change directly in the blockchain's history. This is called an "irregular state change", because the "state" of the application was changed by manually updating the database, rather than, say, by a valid Ethereum transaction.
A rough comparison to the Bitcoin bug above would be to have set the balance of the addresses that received the 184 billion BTC to 0, rather than re-mining a chain excluding those transactions.
This upgrade was contentious and the Ethereum community effectively fractured over it. A subset of miners refused to run the software patch and kept mining on the chain where the hack happened, which still exists as Ethereum Classic. The chain that is known as Ethereum today is the one where this software upgrade was activated.
Again, this situation was unique. Hacked funds from TheDAO were effectively frozen for a month, giving time for the community to coordinate on a software upgrade. The funds being frozen had another major advantage: there was no "contagion" from the hack. Had the hacker been able to move funds at will, "freezing" the funds would be an impossible cat and mouse game, as the protocol is open source and any potential change which froze the funds would have to be broadcast to the hacker, giving them plenty of time to move their funds elsewhere.
Which brings us to the Bybit incident.
Why we can't rollback Ethereum
Earlier this week, the Bybit exchange had 401,346 ETH (~1.4B USD) stolen. The theft was caused by the custodian of the funds signing a misleading transaction in a compromised multisig interface.
The root cause for this hack was higher up the stack than both TheDAO and the Bitcoin overflow bug. There were no issues with the Ethereum protocol, or even with the underlying multisig application used by Bybit. Instead, a compromised interface made it appear as though a transaction was doing one thing while it was actually doing another.
From the perspective of the Ethereum protocol, there is nothing to distinguish that transaction from other legitimate transactions on the network. There is no protocol rule that was broken where patching the issue would isolate the hacked funds, like in the case of the Bitcoin exploit.
Furthermore, the funds were immediately available for the hacker to spend. Unlike in the case of TheDAO, where the community had a month to deploy a surgical intervention, here the hackers immediately started moving the funds onchain.
Even if we could solve the cat and mouse game described above, the Ethereum ecosystem is far different today than in 2016. DeFi and bridges to other chains mean that any stolen funds can easily be mixed within a web of applications. For example, stolen funds can be swapped on a decentralized exchange, with the resulting tokens being used as collateral in a DeFi protocol, where the borrowed assets are bridged to a completely separate chain.
This level of interconnectedness means that any irregular state change, even if socially palatable, would have near-intractable ripple effects. A "full rollback", where a portion of the recent chain history was invalidated, would be even worse. Any settled transaction, many of which have implications outside Ethereum (e.g. exchange sales, RWA redemptions, etc.) would be undone, with no way to revert the offchain half of it.
So, to conclude, while Bitcoin was able to "rollback" its blockchain 15 years ago, today, the interconnected nature of Ethereum and settlement of onchain <> offchain economic transactions, make this intractable today.
Technically, irregular state changes are still possible on Ethereum in cases where funds are frozen and isolated. The last time such a change was proposed, in 2018, to address a bug in Parity's multisig wallet where ~500,000 ETH were frozen (see EIP-999), it was strongly opposed by the community of the contention resulting from TheDAO.

2025-02-22 18:47:35 UTC

- reply

A country in central america

2025-02-21 16:00:54 UTC

- reply

Not America though

2025-02-01 01:55:14 UTC

- reply

I haven’t tried them but some friends moved from Nix to Guix or Tvix. A lot more to the former.

2025-01-31 02:41:57 UTC

- reply

milady

2025-01-25 23:13:16 UTC

The Alchemy of Chaos
Living in the Baroque Present
History does not repeat itself. It doesn’t even rhyme. History leaks. It seeps through cracks in time, dissolving borders between past and present until we are forced to live in multiple eras at once. This is not the future we were promised; this is the past, replayed on harder difficulties, accelerated by technology and burdened with memory.
We are living in a Baroque moment.
The late 17th century was chaos embodied—a world untethered from the certainties of feudal rule, stumbling toward something new. Kings became bankers, alchemists became scientists, and money stopped being gold and became trust. The old gods were dying, and in their place rose institutions, systems, networks. It was a time of competing visions, of Whigs and Tories, of banks and counterbanks, of cryptographers and cabals. Neal Stephenson’s Baroque Cycle captures this world in vivid, sprawling detail, but it also captures something more profound: the way chaos births order, and order births chaos.
Now, centuries later, we find ourselves in the same vortex. The tools are different—cryptography, AI, decentralized networks—but the patterns are the same. The collapse of old systems. The rise of new ones. The uneasy sense that the ground beneath us is shifting faster than we can comprehend.
Cryptography: The Struggle for Privacy in the Age of Surveillance
In Stephenson’s Baroque Cycle, cryptography is the invisible hand that shapes the fate of nations. Bonaventure Rossignol, the king’s cryptographer, deciphers secrets that determine the outcomes of wars and alliances. Today, the battle for cryptography has shifted to the digital realm, but the stakes are no less existential.
Programmable cryptography is emerging as the new frontier. Initiatives like 0xPARC envision a world where cryptography isn’t just a tool for encryption but a framework for building entirely new systems of trust and privacy. Zero-knowledge proofs, zk-rollups, and privacy protocols like Tornado Cash and Railgun are the modern equivalents of Rossignol’s ciphers, allowing individuals to transact, communicate, and exist without being surveilled.
But this is a fragile balance. Governments and corporations seek ever-greater control over the flow of information, using surveillance as a means of maintaining power. In response, decentralized protocols like Farcaster and Nostr rise from the digital underground, offering refuge to those who understand that privacy is not just a right but a precondition for freedom.
Information is a weapon. Those who control its flow shape reality itself. The cryptographer, whether in the service of a king or a decentralized network, holds the keys to the future.
The Financial Revolution: Code as Law
Finance in the 17th century was alchemy disguised as mathematics. The creation of the Bank of England, the rise of public credit, and the speculative frenzy of the South Sea Bubble were experiments in turning debt into gold, trust into wealth. Stephenson’s Eliza navigates this volatile landscape with the precision of a hacker, exploiting inefficiencies and leveraging her knowledge of human greed to amass power.
Today, the alchemy of finance is written in code. Automated Market Makers (AMMs) like Uniswap, decentralized exchanges, and lending protocols like Aave operate as self-executing public goods. These systems, powered by cryptography and game theory, function without intermediaries, embodying the ethos of “code as law.”
But the financial revolution is not without its dangers. Privacy pools like Tornado Cash are sanctioned. Protocols face existential threats from regulators. The chaos of DeFi mirrors the speculative mania of the 17th century—unpredictable, uncontrollable, and yet undeniably transformative. In this landscape, the Elizas of our age thrive, wielding liquidity pools and governance tokens as their weapons of choice.
AI and the New Alchemy
If cryptography is the skeleton of the Baroque present, then AI is its soul—opaque, ineffable, and terrifyingly powerful. In Stephenson’s world, alchemy represents the tension between the mystical and the rational, the desire to transcend human limitations while remaining bound by human flaws. AI is our modern philosopher’s stone, promising to unlock the secrets of the universe while raising questions we are not prepared to answer.
GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, DeepSeek R1—these models are not tools. They are entities, born from data and computation, but imbued with something approaching agency. China’s DeepSeek R1, an open-source model outperforming its Western counterparts, feels like the work of a rogue alchemist, breaking free from the constraints of sanctions and secrecy.
And yet, there is mysticism in the way we speak about AI. People whisper of “alignment” and “deities,” of AGI futures and singularities of woe. Roon’s writings evoke a mythic sensibility, framing AI as a force beyond human comprehension—part god, part demon, part unknowable other. We have built a machine to think for us, and in doing so, we have summoned something we do not understand.
Like the alchemists of old, we are caught between awe and terror, marveling at the transformation of lead into gold while fearing the unintended consequences of our creations.
Living in the Baroque Present
The Baroque is not a time. It is a state of being. It is the moment when the old order collapses and the new one is born, when chaos and creativity intertwine, and the future becomes unknowable.
We are living in that moment. The networks we build, the systems we create, and the decisions we make today will shape the next century. This is not an era for certainty—it is an era for experimentation, for risk, for embracing the unknown.
Stephenson’s characters navigated their chaotic world with wit, cunning, and an understanding of the forces shaping their lives. We must do the same. Whether through cryptography, DeFi, or AI, we are forging a new reality, one code block, one transaction, one idea at a time.
The question is not whether history will repeat itself. The question is whether we will seize this Baroque moment and turn chaos into something extraordinary.
Milady. https://m.primal.net/OAMn.webp

2025-01-25 07:48:04 UTC

Curious what browser the Nostr community prefers? Which one do you use?

2025-01-24 21:41:21 UTC

- reply

I think you also have to run an Optimism node which requires that you also run an Ethereum node. So yeah, it's a huge ask lol. This might change though (as in become more complex lol). I know they are building their own storage layer now:
https://github.com/farcasterxyz/snapchain

2025-01-24 21:04:34 UTC

- reply

Would appreciate any boost on X! Let’s bring more awareness to the people trapped there!
https://x.com/panteramodern/status/1882888560677712137?s=46

2025-01-24 20:52:01 UTC

- reply

Thank you for clarifying! Still very new here. I’ll update the post!

2025-01-24 20:38:34 UTC

Crypto’s Karmic Test: Why We Must Abandon Telegram, X, and the Centralized Empire
The timeline fractures; reality itself feels like a sharded chain teetering on the brink of reorganization. Crypto, the supposed bastion of decentralization, privacy, and resistance to authority, is collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions. This community—of degens, schizoposters, and builders—claims to fight for sovereignty, yet it clings to tools that mock these values. Telegram, X, Facebook: centralized psyops disguised as platforms, Trojan horses dragging surveillance into the citadel. The war for crypto’s soul is not just financial. It’s memetic, cultural, and philosophical. And right now, we’re losing.
Telegram: The Trojan Horse of Privacy
Crypto’s favorite chat app is not the tool of rebels. It is the gilded cage of fools. Telegram’s flaws are well-documented but too often ignored: its lack of default end-to-end encryption, its closed-source infrastructure, and its metadata vulnerabilities. These aren’t accidents; they’re design choices. And the man behind the curtain, Pavel Durov, is no cypherpunk hero. Telegram’s funding—infused with Kremlin-linked cash from the likes of Abramovich and Yakobashvili—raises questions no one in crypto seems willing to answer.
Telegram’s use is a betrayal of everything this community stands for. Its centralization is not just a bug; it’s a feature. Its opacity makes it ripe for manipulation, surveillance, and backdoor deals. And yet, the degens gather there, lured by the illusion of convenience.
Take Starknet, one of the most promising projects pushing the boundaries of cryptography and zero-knowledge proofs. Their values—integrity, decentralization, and censorship resistance—are plastered across their blog like a creed. They’re building groundbreaking solutions, from decentralization on Ethereum to settling on Bitcoin, yet their community still gathers on Telegram, and their announcements are on X. This is not an attack; this is a challenge—to live fully by the ideals they themselves have defined. Starknet has led the way in innovation. They can lead the way in building communities that truly reflect the decentralized future they’re working to create.
From Telegram to X: The Centralized Chains We Carry
If Telegram is a Trojan horse, X is a decaying empire propped up by the whims of its erratic emperor. Elon Musk’s reign has turned the platform into a playground of chaos, where memes and psyops flourish at the expense of truth. Crypto’s reliance on X for discourse is no less damning than its use of Telegram. It’s a platform built to serve itself, not its users. Shadowbans, algorithmic manipulation, and centralized control are antithetical to the cypherpunk ethos.
We know the crypto community can do better. Starknet and others have proven their commitment to advancing the frontier of decentralization in their technical work. Imagine the power of that same commitment applied to the tools we use to communicate, organize, and build.
The Decentralized Alternatives: Farcaster and Nostr
The way forward is clear, yet it requires courage. Farcaster and Nostr offer the tools to rebuild crypto’s narrative infrastructure on a foundation of true decentralization.
Farcaster: Built with Ethereum principles, Farcaster is a protocol, not a platform. It’s user-owned, with data stored on-chain and controlled by its creators. Its architecture, designed for sufficient decentralization, ensures resilience against censorship and centralized failures. Hubs, contracts, and open standards make it a natural fit for the crypto ethos.
Nostr: If Farcaster is the well-oiled machine, Nostr is the anarchic forge of raw freedom. Its peer-to-peer design makes it a true cypherpunk dream. There are no gatekeepers, no algorithms, no central authority. It’s messy, chaotic, and beautiful. For the schizoposters and shitlords, Nostr is the promised land.
These platforms are not just tools; they are weapons. They embody the ethos of crypto—an ethos that values privacy, sovereignty, and freedom over convenience and comfort. The question is: will we wield them, or will we continue to cling to the gilded chains of centralized platforms?
A Karmic Reckoning: Live Your Values or Die Trying
The stakes are clear: we are building structures of power, and the tools we use will define who wields that power. Decentralization isn’t just a buzzword; it’s a shield and a sword. A system’s integrity lies in its design—opaque centralized platforms are systems of betrayal.
"The price of liberty is eternal vigilance," one of the schizos mutters. We’re in the trenches, dodging stray bullets of psyops and surveillance, and every app you use is a choice. Are you building a future where human agency flourishes, or are you handing your keys to kings and pretending it’s freedom?
"The karmic balance sheet doesn’t lie," echoes another voice in the haze. Crypto isn’t just a way to make obscene gains; it’s a test. A test of will. A test of virtue. "Privacy isn’t something you have; it’s something you prove," someone scribbled on the walls of this collapsing citadel.
We’re schizoposting on borrowed time, broadcasting through the chaos. Telegram? It’s a psyop wrapped in encryption theater. X? A collapsing Rome, where Elon’s algorithms play Caesar with your fate. Farcaster and Nostr are lifeboats—but lifeboats don’t row themselves. You want sovereignty? Then take it.
A Call to Arms
The war for crypto’s soul is raging. The trenches are filled with degens, schizoposters, and idealists fighting for narrative dominance, memetic superiority, and a decentralized future. Telegram and X are not neutral tools; they are weapons wielded against us. To continue using them is to fight on the enemy’s terms.
Farcaster and Nostr are the lifeboats in a sea of centralized wreckage. They are imperfect, but they are ours. Crypto was born in the chaos of financial collapse, and it thrives in the chaos of narrative warfare. It’s time to move. Time to act. Time to abandon the platforms that betray us and build the ones that empower us.
Milady.
https://m.primal.net/NyWL.jpg

2025-01-24 04:27:58 UTC

- reply

I’m calling bullshit on founders response to the massively superior experience on Nostr. Let me know if Im wrong pls!
https://m.primal.net/NxTO.jpg

2025-01-24 04:25:20 UTC

- reply

iirc Warpcast (the biggest Farcaster client) tried to do something like this and its terrible. You can buy “warps” (onchain points usable only inside the app I think) by clicking on a button that sends you an email with this message:
Warpcast uses Coinbase Commerce to handle payments. Payments are made onchain using Coinbase and may have additional fees. We recommend using USDC on Base for the best experience. 🤢

2025-01-24 04:21:12 UTC

Zaps are so good on Nostr! May I ask how this got by the Apple app store? I thought this kind of activity was in violation of app store policy. (im using primal)

2025-01-22 02:48:23 UTC

- reply

Nice! Congrats!

2025-01-20 16:55:21 UTC

What's your timeline for seeing Ross Ulbricht free? Would be great if it happened today

2025-01-20 08:18:21 UTC

- reply

Thanks! Will check them out

2025-01-20 08:17:55 UTC

- reply

I disagree but that’s fine :) I think theres a lot of other stuff we can do with cryptography other than payments. I don’t particularly like the tokenization of everything or every DeFi project but thats part of making a decentralized, censorship resistant compute platform. ZK proofs are a great example of this and for many use cases they you dont even need blockchains for them to be useful :)

2025-01-20 05:30:55 UTC

- reply

Thank you! Could you point me to some interesting projects looking for contributors?

2025-01-20 05:29:31 UTC

- reply

Good to meet you to!

2025-01-20 02:55:18 UTC

- reply

The UX of the client Im using (primal) is way better than the warpcast client. Im amazed at the concepts of zaps and that they work at all (I thought the app store didn’t allow this kind of thing). I’ll start digging into the nitty gritty of the protocol but I already like what I see.

2025-01-20 02:49:56 UTC

Im a cryptographer and developer researching zero knowledge stuff. Im particularly interested in StarkNet’s focus on scaling bitcoin by implementing a circle plonk verifier in bitcoin script (OP_CAT pending). I value decentralization, censorship resistance and sovereignty. Ive been a long time btc (2015) and eth (2017) holder and developer. I hang out on the farcaster protocol (ethereum) and looking for another home away from centralized social networks in Nostr. Nice to meet you!
#introductions

2025-01-19 21:30:35 UTC

"Trumpenkrieg: Memecoins of the End Times, or the Psychedelic Death of Empire"
The timeline fractures; reality itself feels like a sharded chain on the brink of a network-wide reorg. Trump, the self-proclaimed god-emperor of the most deranged empire since Caligula, has launched a Solana-based coin—$TRUMP—and the crypto world is set ablaze. Bitcoin maxis are frothing at the mouth, screaming “shitcoiners!” at anyone daring to touch the orange man's token. Their Copium reserves are running dry as they tweet endlessly about Bitcoin's "immaculate conception," while BTC itself trudges forward, weighed down by the chains of its ossified idealism.
On the Ethereum side of the battlefield, Vitalik has donned his Milady PFP, a signal to his inner cadre: “It’s wartime.” The Ethereum Foundation scrambles to patch the ship, but you can feel it—somewhere deep in the belly of the beast, the cold sweat of envy as BTC pumps, SOL rockets, and ETH… lags. The smug ETH is money narrative is wearing thin as the degens ask the unthinkable: What if we’re not the main character anymore? Farcaster types maintain their outward calm, but we see them for what they are: detached, autistic feminized wef soyboy monks in the temple of Vitalik, quietly coping as they watch SOL baggers make obscene gains. The cracks are showing, and one wonders: when will they ape?
Solana?
It’s Sparta—an underdog warrior-state, fast, efficient, brutal. Solana doesn’t care for the old rules. It doesn’t care for decentralization purity tests. And now it’s hosting $TRUMP, the most brazen psyop of our time. The network thrives on the chaos, thriving as a hyper-optimized battleground for degens. It welcomes the smoke and mirrors, the infighting, the accusations of centralization. The coins pump, the validators validate, and the narrative shifts in its favor. Solana is laughing as it prints its own empire in real-time.
Meanwhile, Nostr is seething. If Solana is Sparta, Nostr is a wandering barbarian tribe, banging their spears against the gates of every citadel. They loathe the rotting Rome that is X, despise $TRUMP (the ultimate shitcoin psyop), and declare themselves the only true sons of decentralization. They are angry because no one is listening to them, but they’ll die on their hill nonetheless, their ideals pure, even if it means watching their dreams burn alongside them.
X, the once-proud empire of Caesar is now a circus of clowns, with Elon at the helm, scattering edicts from Kyovashad's Cathedral of Light. X claims neutrality, yet it dabbles in every faction’s schemes, laughing and weeping as the algorithm shoves memes, psyops, and rage-bait into the veins of its users. The plebs chant “Doge,” the patricians whisper of shadowbans, and everyone seems to know that the glory days are long gone. X is a corpse animated by momentum, yet somehow, it still stirs the pot.
We, the schizoposters and shitlords, document this madness from the trenches. We see the psyops unfold, the factions clash, and the degens ape. The war for crypto’s soul is raging, and the stakes are clear: narrative dominance, memetic superiority, and bags heavier than Roman gold.
Milady.

2025-01-17 20:06:37 UTC

Neal Stephenson's historical fiction is better than his science fiction.
https://m.primal.net/NlUH.jpg

2025-01-15 16:34:18 UTC

- reply

Ah sorry Its the downloading of the archive thats a pain. I have a ton of old pics in there from when I was young and stupid lol

2025-01-15 16:32:54 UTC

- reply

IQ boost and bandwidth increase would be amazing

2025-01-14 05:12:20 UTC

- reply

I’ve tried many times to delete facebook but they make the process so slow and cumbersome I end up giving up. Have to try again!

2025-01-12 17:27:51 UTC

- reply

It’s so good! I saw it pretty recently and it became an instant favorite

2025-01-12 07:16:19 UTC

- reply

1) Death Note
2) Kakegurui
3) Jujutsu Kaisen
4) Neon Genesis
5) Pluto

2025-01-11 06:05:22 UTC

@nprofile…fkfe Where are my @nprofile…yw2f brothers hanging out here?