satbull on Nostr: You mean aligned with ‘your’ Vision of the potential of Bitcoin. He will lose out ...
You mean aligned with ‘your’ Vision of the potential of Bitcoin.
He will lose out if there’s a 6102 attack but the majority of big players would capitulate because they would want to avoid jail.
As for ‘playing in to the hands of the state ‘ he is the CEO of a listed USA company and has many fiduciary responsibilities he can’t avoid and it’s not his responsibility to be a beacon for anarchic reform.
He is protecting his interests as we all are.
Overall, I think he has been and is, good for Bitcoin.
He will lose out if there’s a 6102 attack but the majority of big players would capitulate because they would want to avoid jail.
As for ‘playing in to the hands of the state ‘ he is the CEO of a listed USA company and has many fiduciary responsibilities he can’t avoid and it’s not his responsibility to be a beacon for anarchic reform.
He is protecting his interests as we all are.
Overall, I think he has been and is, good for Bitcoin.