Erik Aronesty [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2023-01-31 🗒️ Summary of this message: Concerns over ...
📅 Original date posted:2023-01-31
🗒️ Summary of this message: Concerns over limited block space decreasing acceptance of soft fork opcode tech improvements. Schnorr sigs and vault tech seen as useful for anonymity and security.
📝 Original message:my only concern is that as block space gets limited the likelihood of soft
fork opcode tech improvement proposals getting accepted by the community
goes down
schnorr sigs are extremely useful to me (anon, cheap multisig)
and some sort of vault tech would be very helpful as well
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20230131/8dfd128b/attachment.html>;
🗒️ Summary of this message: Concerns over limited block space decreasing acceptance of soft fork opcode tech improvements. Schnorr sigs and vault tech seen as useful for anonymity and security.
📝 Original message:my only concern is that as block space gets limited the likelihood of soft
fork opcode tech improvement proposals getting accepted by the community
goes down
schnorr sigs are extremely useful to me (anon, cheap multisig)
and some sort of vault tech would be very helpful as well
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20230131/8dfd128b/attachment.html>;