Samuel Moore on Nostr: I often hear how science publishing can be automated because very little of the ...

I often hear how science publishing can be automated because very little of the process requires much human intervention, when in reality the opposite is true. The current state of peer review and fraud is the way it is in no small part because publishers have prioritised profit over the necessary human labour.

https://www.wsj.com/science/whats-wrong-with-peer-review-e5d2d428

[Free: https://archive.ph/ASUXo]