Pieter Wuille [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2011-07-07 🗒️ Summary of this message: Pieter Wuille ...
📅 Original date posted:2011-07-07
🗒️ Summary of this message: Pieter Wuille has no preference for a particular project build system for Bitcoin, as long as it meets certain criteria and is easy to maintain.
📝 Original message:On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 12:44:17PM +0200, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> I have no preference for any particular project build system. If a system
> * is easy enough to set up (included in standard repositories, eg.)
> * allows building of the bitcoin codebase on several linux distro's
> * does cross-compilation to windows
> * supports osx
> * is easy to maintain
> * it is not too hard to adapt other GUI's to use it (bitcoin-qt,
> maybe others as well, i hear about a cocoabitcoin?)
> * gets implemented and tested to support all of the above
> .. i have no problem with choosing that system for future versions.
Other opinions? Someone actually interested in writing a cmake configuration
for bitcoin?
--
Pieter
🗒️ Summary of this message: Pieter Wuille has no preference for a particular project build system for Bitcoin, as long as it meets certain criteria and is easy to maintain.
📝 Original message:On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 12:44:17PM +0200, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> I have no preference for any particular project build system. If a system
> * is easy enough to set up (included in standard repositories, eg.)
> * allows building of the bitcoin codebase on several linux distro's
> * does cross-compilation to windows
> * supports osx
> * is easy to maintain
> * it is not too hard to adapt other GUI's to use it (bitcoin-qt,
> maybe others as well, i hear about a cocoabitcoin?)
> * gets implemented and tested to support all of the above
> .. i have no problem with choosing that system for future versions.
Other opinions? Someone actually interested in writing a cmake configuration
for bitcoin?
--
Pieter