ma𝕏pool on Nostr: nprofile1q…ufa4k Discussions about music, or art in general seem to me to be what ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqknzsux7p6lzwzdedp3m8c3c92z0swzc0xyy5glvse58txj5e9ztqaufa4k (nprofile…fa4k) Discussions about music, or art in general seem to me to be what when AI does it, are called hallucinations, or confabulation. Trying to define music or art even more so.
We can enjoy the clever logical and rhetorical structure of arguments, but we can't get symbol grounding. Like most articles and podcasts about theoretical physics for a layman, you learn nothing.
"There are indeed things that cannot be put into words. … They are what is mystical." – Wittgenstein, Tractatus, 6.522
The meanings we get from music is what Wittgenstein called "Private Language"
“The words of this language are to refer to what only the speaker can know — to his immediate private sensations. So another person cannot understand the language.”
We can enjoy the clever logical and rhetorical structure of arguments, but we can't get symbol grounding. Like most articles and podcasts about theoretical physics for a layman, you learn nothing.
"There are indeed things that cannot be put into words. … They are what is mystical." – Wittgenstein, Tractatus, 6.522
The meanings we get from music is what Wittgenstein called "Private Language"
“The words of this language are to refer to what only the speaker can know — to his immediate private sensations. So another person cannot understand the language.”