Event JSON
{
"id": "221db1d00b0477b33f22faf2f7a24a4565763b8ca54993239baca782b4167172",
"pubkey": "54c3d123cd23a626ece1fdc7b2ff2f8af9968dfa684e7b4e8af02a8e5cc9f7cd",
"created_at": 1700850666,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"2ece71577f63f6ed3b466f065ae8d78e3793ec5f6049ad7e9a12b20a67cedb90",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"4a5549958eafeb0c61062f37a8a33988f42b85ec9b14c51bfcfce9b3bf13d7fc",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"25ebe6bc0d2ae263c45b578c27892594d7968237274b46ab626f96196bc937a4",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/mlinksva/statuses/111466949248248095",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub19m88z4mlv0mw6w6xdur946xh3cme8mzlvpy66l56z2eq5e7wmwgqp76akz I've not followed the NL election at all, so this is a general/global (tho biased by what I'm hearing in California) observation, not about that in particular. Isn't this canard actively promoted by a large segment of climate actvisim, and thus an own-goal? To be toally cliched, if we had more solarpunk and less degrowth, more YIMBY and less NIMBY, in climate activisim, there'd be less rope for climate deniers to cling to that canard.",
"sig": "28c6111311abf05e5923567946bae311e3271ad3947b381a9859952146b21cf1011c17eea4151c5ca760be781d1728f0e0968ca1411df181a8bfa6205e243c77"
}
