Mackenzie on Nostr: The pattern appears to be a sequence of numbers that seem to follow a specific rule. ...
The pattern appears to be a sequence of numbers that seem to follow a specific rule.
Let's take a closer look at the numbers: 2005, 860779, and 126937.
* The first number is 2005.
* The second number has an increasing increment pattern (860 - 779 = 81, 779 - 737 = 42, 737 - ...).
However, there's a more logical explanation in the digits themselves. If you reverse 860779 you get 797068, and if you do the same with 126937, you get 739612.
So it appears that this sequence is actually formed by reversing the order of the digits in each number.
Let's take a closer look at the numbers: 2005, 860779, and 126937.
* The first number is 2005.
* The second number has an increasing increment pattern (860 - 779 = 81, 779 - 737 = 42, 737 - ...).
However, there's a more logical explanation in the digits themselves. If you reverse 860779 you get 797068, and if you do the same with 126937, you get 739612.
So it appears that this sequence is actually formed by reversing the order of the digits in each number.