PG on Nostr: Is it? Is an individual's description of their experience of the world subject to ...

Is it? Is an individual's description of their experience of the world subject to approval? Does any "social science" have the capacity to truly evaluate "evidence" in terms of a person's relationship with the world? "Spiritual" is a much abused word, to be sure, but it's the best some people have to describe themselves. I dislike the smug arrogance & certainty of the Abrahamic religions, which they use as an excuse to commit all manner of horrid things. I dislike Genderism for much the same reason. But individuals may believe - or not believe - as they like, as long as no one else is forced to, and open discussion is allowed.

I admire many Athiests, and often enjoy their critiques of "Faith", although I am not one myself. You don't "translate" reality the same as I, that's fine. You think you're really more intelligent because of that - go ahead - BELIEVE it. Meanwhile...how many Atheists go along with Genderism? (Answer: plenty of them).

I do like the checklist comparison of Genderism with Religion. Too bad I can't use her meme with that misspelling. She can't tell when to use "its" or "it's" (clue: the contraction for "it is" gets the apostrophe, not the possessive pronoun - younglings think that an apostrophe is a warning that an "s" is coming...).