JW prince of CPH on Nostr: npub1pu7ty…6pdj6 I think rhetorics can have lengthy discussions about this - like, ...
npub1pu7tyn4lajv927jh9fr6z0w2nvqjscrjf55es0gu5xsgp2nes99qn6pdj6 (npub1pu7…pdj6) I think rhetorics can have lengthy discussions about this - like, for example, if we say that "effective" = "producing *any* effect" doesn't that mean that literally *everything* is effective, and does that not invalidate having a word for it at all?
Wouldn't the reason we have a word like that be that we want a word to describe achieving an effect we agree upon to be beneficial?
Also, can evil be desirable? Why would we call it evil, then?
You know, et cetera...
Published at
2023-05-20 11:35:36Event JSON
{
"id": "27123dd271c0923bc57aa65b6d1903ca00829cd335c2d3754d097ee34f7f8299",
"pubkey": "35a9e751c64803ccac646107311b5f5633ea7084bdc740597bdd6b71e7670a6b",
"created_at": 1684582536,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"0f3cb24ebfec98557a572a47a13dca9b012860724d29983d1ca1a080aa79814a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"6c067ee3395bf49d21504349d95f5fff5edf41ec64aa8951334e889dbaf8e31f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"0bfb7996ec1b786da5e493614c6af32d51972b15bc99576dfd5addb6ee94a2fa",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://norrebro.space/users/jwcph/statuses/110400801136459066"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1pu7tyn4lajv927jh9fr6z0w2nvqjscrjf55es0gu5xsgp2nes99qn6pdj6 I think rhetorics can have lengthy discussions about this - like, for example, if we say that \"effective\" = \"producing *any* effect\" doesn't that mean that literally *everything* is effective, and does that not invalidate having a word for it at all? \n\nWouldn't the reason we have a word like that be that we want a word to describe achieving an effect we agree upon to be beneficial? \n\nAlso, can evil be desirable? Why would we call it evil, then? \n\nYou know, et cetera...",
"sig": "dc8967cefe962585cdeec5ef499e45dd2efaaa29934f3996c2a2b44f67482d46e89ce8ec66c1c560884b43f458310703bf5f8e2282d5c6205645804ba13b3a9d"
}
