Joseph Poon [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-13 📝 Original message: Hi Mats, Yes, I agree ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-08-13
📝 Original message:
Hi Mats,
Yes, I agree that this is a possibility.
I had discussed this model of OP_CLTV without OP_CSV using a balance
reserve on the mailing list, along with some caveats on the
risks/effects of doing so.
Message ID: 20150727193714.GA16768 at lightning.network
Link:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2015-July/000070.html
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 08:37:18PM +0200, Mats Jerratsch wrote:
> Joseph asked, what changes OP_CLTV would bring to my Thunder proposal,
> and I started working out, how much is actually possible with only
> CLTV implemented.
I think very minor changes to the code would result in full lightning
channels, as per Rusty's doc, yes. I think there will be huge benefits
to Bitcoin if bitcoinj has an implementation ready when OP_CLTV/OP_CSV
is implemented.
--
Joseph Poon
📝 Original message:
Hi Mats,
Yes, I agree that this is a possibility.
I had discussed this model of OP_CLTV without OP_CSV using a balance
reserve on the mailing list, along with some caveats on the
risks/effects of doing so.
Message ID: 20150727193714.GA16768 at lightning.network
Link:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2015-July/000070.html
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 08:37:18PM +0200, Mats Jerratsch wrote:
> Joseph asked, what changes OP_CLTV would bring to my Thunder proposal,
> and I started working out, how much is actually possible with only
> CLTV implemented.
I think very minor changes to the code would result in full lightning
channels, as per Rusty's doc, yes. I think there will be huge benefits
to Bitcoin if bitcoinj has an implementation ready when OP_CLTV/OP_CSV
is implemented.
--
Joseph Poon