Dame Apple Dumplin>KingsValley on Nostr: npub1v62k8…g6c55 Tinker v. Des Moines Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503 (1969) The majority ...
npub1v62k8k90uekadxwy4qxppps7vw9cr2xe3chpu6avp46e0825ewesrg6c55 (npub1v62…6c55)
Tinker v. Des Moines Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503 (1969)
The majority asserted that the First Amendment protected the speech and expressive conduct of children in public schools, which meant that any policy restricting speech would need to be justified on constitutional grounds. While a school board will receive some deference from courts, it must be able to cite something more than discomfort, awkwardness, or inconvenience as a basis for restricting speech.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/393/503/
Tinker v. Des Moines Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503 (1969)
The majority asserted that the First Amendment protected the speech and expressive conduct of children in public schools, which meant that any policy restricting speech would need to be justified on constitutional grounds. While a school board will receive some deference from courts, it must be able to cite something more than discomfort, awkwardness, or inconvenience as a basis for restricting speech.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/393/503/