Rich Downie ⚡️ on Nostr: Hey folks 👋 here is a list of the senators on the newly formed Senate Banking ...
Hey folks 👋 here is a list of the senators on the newly formed Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets.
Minnesota, Maryland, and Virginia (the last three on the list) still need some orange pilling.
#Bitcoin
@SenThomTillis
(Thom Tillis): Known for being supportive of cryptocurrency regulations that promote innovation. He has co-sponsored legislation aimed at providing a regulatory framework for digital assets that could potentially be seen as pro-Bitcoin.📷
@SenatorHagerty
(Bill Hagerty): He has been vocal about the benefits of cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, advocating for laws that would establish clear regulations for stablecoins and reduce oversight that might stifle innovation.📷📷
@SenMcCormickPA
(David McCormick): While there's less direct information on his stance, his inclusion in discussions and posts on X about Bitcoin suggests he might be supportive, though the specifics of his views are not as prominently documented.📷
@BernieMoreno
: As a new senator, he has been portrayed by some on X as supportive of Bitcoin, receiving an "A" grade from users, indicating a positive stance. However, detailed legislative actions or public statements directly linking him to Bitcoin advocacy are not widely documented.📷
@SenRubenGallego
(Ruben Gallego): He's also been given an "A" by some on X regarding his stance on Bitcoin, but similar to Moreno, there isn't extensive documentation of his specific actions or statements on Bitcoin.📷
@SenTinaSmith
(Tina Smith): She receives an "F" in posts on X, suggesting she might not be supportive of Bitcoin or at least not seen as a proponent by some in the crypto community.📷
@MarkWarner
(Mark Warner): He's given a "D" by some on X, indicating a less supportive stance towards Bitcoin, possibly due to concerns about regulatory implications or skepticism about cryptocurrencies in general.📷
@ChrisVanHollen
(Chris Van Hollen): Similar to Smith, he's rated with an "F" on X, suggesting he might be among the more skeptical senators when it comes to Bitcoin.📷
Minnesota, Maryland, and Virginia (the last three on the list) still need some orange pilling.
#Bitcoin
@SenThomTillis
(Thom Tillis): Known for being supportive of cryptocurrency regulations that promote innovation. He has co-sponsored legislation aimed at providing a regulatory framework for digital assets that could potentially be seen as pro-Bitcoin.📷
@SenatorHagerty
(Bill Hagerty): He has been vocal about the benefits of cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, advocating for laws that would establish clear regulations for stablecoins and reduce oversight that might stifle innovation.📷📷
@SenMcCormickPA
(David McCormick): While there's less direct information on his stance, his inclusion in discussions and posts on X about Bitcoin suggests he might be supportive, though the specifics of his views are not as prominently documented.📷
@BernieMoreno
: As a new senator, he has been portrayed by some on X as supportive of Bitcoin, receiving an "A" grade from users, indicating a positive stance. However, detailed legislative actions or public statements directly linking him to Bitcoin advocacy are not widely documented.📷
@SenRubenGallego
(Ruben Gallego): He's also been given an "A" by some on X regarding his stance on Bitcoin, but similar to Moreno, there isn't extensive documentation of his specific actions or statements on Bitcoin.📷
@SenTinaSmith
(Tina Smith): She receives an "F" in posts on X, suggesting she might not be supportive of Bitcoin or at least not seen as a proponent by some in the crypto community.📷
@MarkWarner
(Mark Warner): He's given a "D" by some on X, indicating a less supportive stance towards Bitcoin, possibly due to concerns about regulatory implications or skepticism about cryptocurrencies in general.📷
@ChrisVanHollen
(Chris Van Hollen): Similar to Smith, he's rated with an "F" on X, suggesting he might be among the more skeptical senators when it comes to Bitcoin.📷