What is Nostr?
Edmund Edgar [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ass…u5p3
2023-06-07 15:43:05
in reply to nevent1q…um68

Edmund Edgar [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-23 📝 Original message:> So to point out what I ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-07-23
📝 Original message:> So to point out what I consider obvious: if Bitcoin requires central
> control over its rules by a group of developers, it is completely
> uninteresting to me. Consensus changes should be done using consensus, and
> the default in case of controversy is no change.

This is a really interesting thread. Since we're no longer talking
about a consensus of the core committers, which would be central
control, but instead something broader, could you say a bit more about
what this consensus might look like, and how we'll know if we've got
one?

In plain language "no controversy" sounds like very high bar for a
diverse community like this; Even bringing in P2SH kicked up a fair
bit of fur and feathers. Do you have a definition in mind where it
isn't an _impossibly_ high one?

--
Edmund Edgar
Founder, Social Minds Inc (KK)
Twitter: @edmundedgar
Linked In: edmundedgar
Skype: edmundedgar
http://www.socialminds.jp

Reality Keys
@realitykeys
support at realitykeys.com
https://www.realitykeys.com
Author Public Key
npub1assqju94qjdpunps2yck2vtzfhnme5pclv0aantfajkjs5w2057quzu5p3