Thomas Voegtlin [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27 📝 Original message:Le 27/03/2014 14:44, Pavol ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27
📝 Original message:Le 27/03/2014 14:44, Pavol Rusnak a écrit :
> On 03/27/2014 01:06 PM, Thomas Voegtlin wrote:
>> Yes, I was planning to increase the number of available unused addresses
>> to 10 or 20 in the bip32 version of Electrum.
>
> Also, we'd need to specify a "gap limit" for accounts as well. In TREZOR
> we currently use 0, which means that the scan will stop as soon as we
> hit first account with no transaction history (meaning that its first
> X=10 addresses are unused).
>
I agree with that. I was planning to do the same (no gap)
Note: Maybe we could just look at the first address of each account,
instead of the first 10 ?
📝 Original message:Le 27/03/2014 14:44, Pavol Rusnak a écrit :
> On 03/27/2014 01:06 PM, Thomas Voegtlin wrote:
>> Yes, I was planning to increase the number of available unused addresses
>> to 10 or 20 in the bip32 version of Electrum.
>
> Also, we'd need to specify a "gap limit" for accounts as well. In TREZOR
> we currently use 0, which means that the scan will stop as soon as we
> hit first account with no transaction history (meaning that its first
> X=10 addresses are unused).
>
I agree with that. I was planning to do the same (no gap)
Note: Maybe we could just look at the first address of each account,
instead of the first 10 ?