Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-01-30 📝 Original message:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2014-01-30
📝 Original message:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Chuck <chuck+bitcoindev at borboggle.com>wrote:

> In arbitration the merchant could argue the transactions seen on the
> network were insufficient.
>

The arbitrator would presumably have some rules about what is or isn't an
acceptable form of payment.

HTTP has response codes for submission of the Payment message. We could add
signing to PaymentACK and other things in future, if that turns out to be
insufficient in practice.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140130/5db41388/attachment.html>;