Glyph on Nostr: The problem with this message is that it's made to be subverted. XP took a hard ...

The problem with this message is that it's made to be subverted. XP took a hard stance and proposed a specific technique and thereby could be wrong. IMO its bets on automated tests and continuous integration won, but pairing didn't. But that was also what made it valuable. Agile, by contrast, wanted to be so broad as to never be wrong. Should I value humans over software? Sure. But what does that look like in practice? Every choice has advocates and adversaries, and they're all human.