Lloyd Fournier [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2022-04-09 📝 Original message:Hey all, A good first step ...

📅 Original date posted:2022-04-09
📝 Original message:Hey all,

A good first step might be to express this as a research problem on
bitcoinproblems.org! I've had in mind creating a problem page on how to
design a PQ TR commitment in each key so that if QC were to become a
reality we could softfork to enable that spend (and disable normal key path
spends):
https://github.com/bitcoin-problems/bitcoin-problems.github.io/issues/4

Becoming the author/maintainer of this problem is as simple as making a PR
to the repo. The problem doesn't have to be focused on a TR solution but
could be a general description of the problem with that and others as a
potential solution direction.

Cheers,

LL

On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 at 18:39, Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 4:33 PM Christopher Allen <
> ChristopherA at lifewithalacrity.com> wrote:
>
>> That being said, it is interesting research. Here is the best link about
>> this particular approach:
>>
>> https://ntruprime.cr.yp.to/software.html
>>
>
> Also I think this is the original academic paper:
>
> https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/826.pdf
>
> <https://ntruprime.cr.yp.to/software.html>;
>>
> — Christopher Allen _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220410/e3a818db/attachment.html>;