Tao Effect [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-06-06 📝 Original message:I don't know what you mean ...

📅 Original date posted:2017-06-06
📝 Original message:I don't know what you mean by "render the replay threat moot."

If you don't have replay protection, replay is always a threat. A very serious one.

--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.

> On Jun 6, 2017, at 5:19 PM, Kekcoin <kekcoin at protonmail.com <mailto:kekcoin at protonmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hmm, that's not the difference I was talking about. I was referring to the fact that using "post-chainsplit coinbases from the non-148 chain" to unilaterally (ie. can be done without action on the 148-chain) taint coins is more secure in extreme-adverserial cases such as secret-mining reorg attacks (as unfeasibly expensive they may be); the only large-scale (>100 block) reorganization the non-148 chain faces should be a resolution of the chainsplit and therefore render the replay threat moot.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170606/b2d1e1e6/attachment-0001.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170606/b2d1e1e6/attachment-0001.sig>;