Fir :transspecies star: on Nostr: Sofia m o μ s e >I'm liberated in my telio sexual identity, but It doesn't include ...
Sofia (npub1qxx…u6la) m o μ s e (npub19kn…0fes) >I'm liberated in my telio sexual identity, but It doesn't include me having sex with whatever adult I want just because that's what I want. It means I am not legally able to be discriminated against for those sexual desires.
>Irrelevant, I'm not arguing what the AOC could be. And, I'm not necessarily against its reduction with a reduction of the AOM.
>It's good to get rid of restrictions that don't have good reason to exist, but some restrictions do have good reasons, this isn't an argument about youthlib, it's about MAP sexual freedoms.
>It isn't an assumption, your argument for why youthlib is pro-c hinges on trying to prove why it isn't anti-c. That is an inherently MAP/AAM focused position, as it is possible to advocate youthlib apart from any MAP/AAM ideology.
>Thought experiments are an important part of understanding your own views, don't be so quick to dismiss them. The abstraction you present requires a world where many more variables have come into play. It would require the elimination of the possibility of parent-child physical and mental abuse, parental sexual assault, disagreements in general between parents and children, etc, as opposed to one variable, the existence of aams. Beyond that the ability to separate from your parents benefits all youths, the ability for adults to receive sexual consent benefits few youths.
>It was a thought experiment for you to consider, I'm not saying the abolition/reduction of the AOC isn't good or possible. I'm saying youthlib isn't tied to aoc abolition per se, and rather its reduction or abolition is tied to youthlib.
>Irrelevant, I'm not arguing what the AOC could be. And, I'm not necessarily against its reduction with a reduction of the AOM.
>It's good to get rid of restrictions that don't have good reason to exist, but some restrictions do have good reasons, this isn't an argument about youthlib, it's about MAP sexual freedoms.
>It isn't an assumption, your argument for why youthlib is pro-c hinges on trying to prove why it isn't anti-c. That is an inherently MAP/AAM focused position, as it is possible to advocate youthlib apart from any MAP/AAM ideology.
>Thought experiments are an important part of understanding your own views, don't be so quick to dismiss them. The abstraction you present requires a world where many more variables have come into play. It would require the elimination of the possibility of parent-child physical and mental abuse, parental sexual assault, disagreements in general between parents and children, etc, as opposed to one variable, the existence of aams. Beyond that the ability to separate from your parents benefits all youths, the ability for adults to receive sexual consent benefits few youths.
>It was a thought experiment for you to consider, I'm not saying the abolition/reduction of the AOC isn't good or possible. I'm saying youthlib isn't tied to aoc abolition per se, and rather its reduction or abolition is tied to youthlib.