Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: đź“… Original date posted:2013-02-13 đź“ť Original message:On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at ...
đź“… Original date posted:2013-02-13
đź“ť Original message:On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com>wrote:
> Since, in the long run,
> Bitcoin can't meet its security and decenteralization promises without
> blockspace scarcity to drive non-trivial fees and without scaling
> limits to keep it decenteralized— it's not a change that could be made
> more lightly than changing the supply of coin.
>
I disagree with Gregory on this. I believe that Bitcoin CAN meet its
security and decentralization promises without any hard limit on block
size.
I had a fruitful discussion about this with an economist friend this
weekend, and I'll eventually getting around to writing up why I believe
raising the block size limit will not be a problem.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130213/d0f63490/attachment.html>
đź“ť Original message:On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com>wrote:
> Since, in the long run,
> Bitcoin can't meet its security and decenteralization promises without
> blockspace scarcity to drive non-trivial fees and without scaling
> limits to keep it decenteralized— it's not a change that could be made
> more lightly than changing the supply of coin.
>
I disagree with Gregory on this. I believe that Bitcoin CAN meet its
security and decentralization promises without any hard limit on block
size.
I had a fruitful discussion about this with an economist friend this
weekend, and I'll eventually getting around to writing up why I believe
raising the block size limit will not be a problem.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130213/d0f63490/attachment.html>