Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2022-06-15 š Original message:On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at ...
š
Original date posted:2022-06-15
š Original message:On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 02:53:58AM +0000, Luke Dashjr wrote:
> Bitcoin Knots still uses this service bit, FWIW (though due to a bug in some
> older versions, it wasn't signalled by default). There are probably at least
> 100 nodes with full RBF already.
Right. However it looks like you do not add NODE_REPLACE_BY_FEE to the list
returned by GetDesirableServiceFlags, so those nodes won't preferentially peer
with each other.
Also, if NODE_REPLACE_BY_FEE is added to the desirable service flags, it
ideally needs to be supported by the DNS seeds too. Currently it is not.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220614/db13f666/attachment-0001.sig>;
š Original message:On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 02:53:58AM +0000, Luke Dashjr wrote:
> Bitcoin Knots still uses this service bit, FWIW (though due to a bug in some
> older versions, it wasn't signalled by default). There are probably at least
> 100 nodes with full RBF already.
Right. However it looks like you do not add NODE_REPLACE_BY_FEE to the list
returned by GetDesirableServiceFlags, so those nodes won't preferentially peer
with each other.
Also, if NODE_REPLACE_BY_FEE is added to the desirable service flags, it
ideally needs to be supported by the DNS seeds too. Currently it is not.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220614/db13f666/attachment-0001.sig>;