Gmail [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: π Original date posted:2014-05-12 π Original message:What about 0 confirmation ...
π
Original date posted:2014-05-12
π Original message:What about 0 confirmation inputs?
Mightn't this make tiny "spam" transactions unsafely inexpensive?
> On May 12, 2014, at 20:21, Peter Grigor <peter at grigor.ws> wrote:
>
>
> I propose the transaction fee should be calculated from a percentage of the input amount divided by the confirmations of the input multiplied by the number of inputs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140512/58f4b564/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1593 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140512/58f4b564/attachment.p7s>
π Original message:What about 0 confirmation inputs?
Mightn't this make tiny "spam" transactions unsafely inexpensive?
> On May 12, 2014, at 20:21, Peter Grigor <peter at grigor.ws> wrote:
>
>
> I propose the transaction fee should be calculated from a percentage of the input amount divided by the confirmations of the input multiplied by the number of inputs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140512/58f4b564/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1593 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140512/58f4b564/attachment.p7s>