GrapheneOS on Nostr: We'd have no problem with having local neural network features for users, but they'd ...
We'd have no problem with having local neural network features for users, but they'd have to be open source. We wouldn't want anything saving state by default. It'd have to be open source to be included as a feature in GrapheneOS though, and none of it has been so it's not included.
Published at
2025-02-08 17:17:15Event JSON
{
"id": "2b3f45d4daad36891f78f4b8c1035b49e8a466f5f3e536fc53e6f98a30e85880",
"pubkey": "5468bceeb74ce35cb4173dcc9974bddac9e894a74bf3d44f9ca8b7554605c9ed",
"created_at": 1739035035,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5505c4bc7b5166aacb5385a6db75612aec75fcb1f558d18a345dfe954f95dc6b",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://grapheneos.social/users/GrapheneOS/statuses/113969400084078754",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "We'd have no problem with having local neural network features for users, but they'd have to be open source. We wouldn't want anything saving state by default. It'd have to be open source to be included as a feature in GrapheneOS though, and none of it has been so it's not included.",
"sig": "f22f1257cb1a9ccc23debf17b2edb64199ca4360ef5e7ffbc33ca58b497898810071b0149592b55de7e6dd7afcc7e4f08e3e1b7d27c46e719ff06ffd499f0762"
}
